Research & Information Architecture
What the change means for UX research and information architecture — mental models, intent, and the discoverability barrier.
This page reorders the material of the other two sections for UX Researcher and Information Architect.
What changes for research & IA
- Map the intent people cannot name. Because of the discoverability barrier, observed behaviour under-estimates what users would delegate. Design for the non-prompter as the normal case, not the edge. See Intent-based interaction.
- Top-down navigation coexists with intent. Those who start from their own case skip the hierarchy. Do not delete the structure: flank it with direct, intent-based access. See The user’s language replaces the system’s taxonomy.
- AI literacy as a research variable. Trust calibration diverges between stated and acted trust; measure it behaviourally. See Trust, AI literacy and calibration.
- The private conversation is unobservable. The most influential brand conversation happens in private chats no research method reaches. See The conversations you cannot observe.
What you cannot decide alone
- Nomenclature ownership sits with the catalogue and ERP, not the IA — see Product & Design.
- How far delegation can go is shared with Product & Design and Legal & Governance.